A Brief Study of Barcelona’s Formations and Happy Anagrams: MIRTH, ZAP ME

By: Isaiah | July 24th, 2007

There’s little else Barcelona fans seem to be discussing these days and with a couple of requests to do so myself, I’ve decided to weigh in on the weightiest of issues: the roster. It’s fat, it’s probably not all that happy, and it’s supposedly working harder than ever towards the six trophies they were supposed to win last year, but didn’t. In fact, only one player on the team starts the year as a defending champion of anything domestic and that’s newly-arrived Eric Abidal (Ligue 1 with Lyon).* Not only that, but several of the new players on the squad (Bojan, Gio, and Olmo) are fresh off of being relegated to the Tercera, which is the Spanish equivalent of the Nationwide Conference, if I’m not mistaken. That Barcelona B was so disastrous last season is hardly indicative of what those particular players will offer to the first team, but it is indicative of the state of affairs in the Barcelona academy. [I’ve written before, briefly, about the academy, so suffice it to say that I am not happy with it.]

As for how the new faces (Thierry Henry, Gabi Milito, Eric Abidal, and Yaya Toure) will fare is mainly up to the formations and playing time Rijkaard elects to go with. Naturally. I doubt many people reading this were unaware of that fact, but despite its elementary nature, that is the entire issue. Who plays? Here is the entire lineup, in case you’d like to make your own permutations of the starting 11:

GK: Victor Valdes,
Def: Carles Puyol, Eric Abidal, Gianlucca Zambrotta, Lilian Thuram, Gabriel Milito, Sylvinho, Oleguer, Juliano Belletti, Jesus Olmo, Rafael Marquez
Mid: Xavi Hernandez, Yaya Toure, Edmilson, Thiago Motta, Andres Iniesta, Deco
For: Eidur Gudjohnsen, Bojan Krkic, Giovanni Dos Santos, Ronaldinho, Lionel Messi, Samuel Eto’o, Thierry Henry

No doubt most people are pushing for the star-studded lineup of ZAPMEMIRTH**:

Valdes, Zambrotta, Puyol, Milito, Abidal, Toure, Messi, Deco, Ronaldinho, Eto’o, Henry

Few seem to be suggesting something other than this. I understand the sentiment, but Barcelona’s failings from 2006/07 were not based around a lack of goals (as has been pointed out by astute readers, Barcelona scored the 3rd most amount of goals in European domestic competition with 78), but rather on the inability to keep opponents pinned in. The best example of this might be the Espanyol game when the league was lost, or what I think of as the truly decisive point: Betis’ Rafael Sobis calmly slotting the ball home to draw the score level at 1-1. The question is not the attacking third or even the defensive third (4th fewest goals allowed in European domestic competition with 33), but rather the middle third, where the things seemed to break down.

In a lineup with so many attackers, who is going to retreat into defense? Certainly not Ronaldinho, Eto’o, or Henry, which leaves Deco and Messi as the ones to track back. Deco does it with enough spirit, if not exactly enough skill, but Messi rarely shows the will to win the ball back if it crosses into his own defensive half. In the Copa America I was surprised to see him hustling back now and again, but it never struck me as something he really wanted to be doing. After all, El Jefecito Mascherano was usually there to save the day. Unless Yaya Toure turns out to be a revelation in defending, then I would expect Edmilson to be the main man for another season in the holding position. Marquez is good there too, so I would expect to see him now and then, with very infrequent moonlighting by Xavi or Motta. Assuming, though, that Toure is worth is €9m fee, then he’ll be able to put in solid performances somewhere along the line, if not immediately.

My perferred lineup would look like this:

Valdes, Zambrotta, Puyol, Milito, Abidal, Toure, Xavi, Messi, Deco, Ronaldinho, Eto’o

The difference is fairly simple: substitute an attacker for a more defensive-minded player. While it relegates both Iniesta and Henry to the bench, they become super subs capable of doing the damage if necessary. This naturally puts Gudjohnsen on the far back burner (to the point where he’d become the new Saviola in a lot of respects: early round Copa del Rey appearances and perhaps a Levski Sofia level CL appearance). The star power of a Thierry Henry is undeniable, as is his talent, but he seems to drift wide, especially to the left, a spot that is already occupied by one Ronaldinho Gaucho. They say he’s pretty good too. And were he to drift right, that’s Messi’s territory. The way it works primarily for Barcelona is a triangle attack, with Deco or Iniesta shooting up the middle in order to direct passes to feet. Henry doesn’t add any significant aerial firepower, despite his size, so what does he provide that no one else can? So far, after too many hours of deliberation while filling in spreadsheets at work (don’t tell my boss), I can’t think of a good reason to inject him into the lineup as it stands (as a direct replacement) or reorganizing everyone to fit him. After all, while Ronaldinho in the middle of the park is a nifty idea, it’s never really proven itself to work and anyway, that would bring up the question of Deco, who is assuredly a better central midfielder than Ronnie. And then if you stick “TH14″ on the right, you encounter the same issue, but with Messi. Dropping any of the front four (Deco, Ronnie, Messi, Eto’o) would threaten to upset the goalscoring machine that is Barcelona. And why bother doing that?

And if you just scrunch Henry in up top, you threaten to open the team up at the back, much like a certain Real Madrid was easily shredded over the previous 3 years. While there is a more veteran core of defenders in the Camp Nou than there was in Madrid prior to this last season, there is little to suggest that Toure or Edmilson would be able to effectively control the midfield while the front 5 were standing around watching. I mean, you actually notice when Ronaldinho or Messi play defense, so that means it rarely happens. And what’s to suggest they would suddenly become end-to-end players? Nothing, because that’s not who they are.

What’s really, really unfortunate about the whole thing is that my lineup anagrams to “ZAP! Dim term.” Dammit.

The great thing about the pre-season and the first 3 jornadas of La Liga is that none of Barcelona’s opponents are top notch. Compare that to Real Madrid’s opening weekend encounter with Atlético Madrid and the lineup of Racing, Athletic Bilbao, and Osasuna will allow for some coddling of the team and a few tactical experiments on Rijkaard’s part. That Sevilla is 4th should force his hand into a static lineup, but that’s not until September 23, a full 2 months after the pre-season opens and a time when Puyol should be back at full strength. If he’s not, the lineups listed above do change, but only minutely as you can just substitute Thuram for Puyol. Another question mark will be Toure, who may or may not be up to the challenges provided by Barcelona and the Spanish league, much less the Champions League, whose first group stage game is September 18-19. So perhaps you also can liberally substitute Edmilson for Toure wherever you’d like, though it does ruin my anagram: Tzar, Dime ‘Em.

Now if Belletti plays for Zambrotta…then there’s an anagram gold mine: A Bet Dimmer, to name just one.

*I’m not in any way, shape, or form disparaging Barcelona’s second-place finish in last year’s La Liga, semifinal appearance in the Copa del Rey or the round of 16 exit from the Champions League. I think I should make that abundantly clear right now, before things really get started. Statistical analysis of the first of those competitions suggests Barcelona deserved to be in the top 2 - and really they deserved the title, but that bitter pill I should just go ahead and swallow because no amount of bitching is going to erase the images taken at the Plaza de Cibeles - and it was a fluke loss to Getafe that dropped them from the Copa del Rey. Liverpool seemed the better team across the two nights and that is that. Losses happen, but in the singular they do not necessarily suggest a greater meaning (suggesting Liverpool is better than Barcelona or vice versa based on 2 games is akin to saying Mexico beating Brazil in the Copa America means the tricolor are the better of the two teams). I am, to be perfectly clear, proud of a second place finish. Disappointed at the same time, of course, but proud and very much looking forward to the new season.

**All right so the I is for Iniesta, but not even anagram builders could come up with words when I put in D for Deco…





Subscribe
 

rss_icon The Offside RSS Feeds

Print
Print article
Share
del.icio.us:A Brief Study of Barcelona's Formations and Happy Anagrams: MIRTH, ZAP ME digg:A Brief Study of Barcelona's Formations and Happy Anagrams: MIRTH, ZAP ME reddit:A Brief Study of Barcelona's Formations and Happy Anagrams: MIRTH, ZAP ME fark:A Brief Study of Barcelona's Formations and Happy Anagrams: MIRTH, ZAP ME Y!:A Brief Study of Barcelona's Formations and Happy Anagrams: MIRTH, ZAP ME stumbleupon:A Brief Study of Barcelona's Formations and Happy Anagrams: MIRTH, ZAP ME

Comments  

  • Mac |  July 24th, 2007 at 9:43 am

    cornercorner

    Where is the V for Victor Valdes?

    I’m missing something, aren’t I?

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Lubaba |  July 24th, 2007 at 10:12 am

    cornercorner

    I don’t think signing Henry was entirely necessary for our game, but more as a gesture to the fans that Barça means business. If Rijkaard is indeed obligated to field all four strikers, then I expect he will elect to do so only for certain teams. When we play anyone in the top 6-8, I don’t want him to take any risks and revert to more midfielders. I like the combination of Marquez-Xavi-Iniesta-Deco (in a 3-4-3). It would be a shame to relegate any of them to the bench just to stick Henry, when god knows where he’s going to play. Whatever, I just don’t want to see the same mistakes all over again.

    Too many strikers! We don’t need Gudjohnsen, who never convinced me. I’ve seen Bojan and Gio play; there’s a lot of talent there, but god knows when they’re going to get playing time. Wait, check that, never. I say loan them out so they can keep playing and getting top-flight experience in whatever league.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Isaiah |  July 24th, 2007 at 10:38 am

    cornercorner

    Mac, the V for Valdes was cut because V would make too many consonants, though you feel free to experiment on your own using the linked anagram builder (and then post your findings here).

    Lubaba, you’re probably right about Bojan and Gio needing to be loaned out, but I don’t see it happening. It seems to me that few players put out on loan really come back to play for Barcelona. Where they get playing time, I don’t know. Probably Copa del Rey, Copa Catalunya.

    As for Guddie, he’s a solid striker, if not world class, and so keeping him on as a third option is a pretty good idea (especially as Bojan and Gio continue to develop). Whether he deserves a starting spot is hardly the question, because he doesn’t, but if Eto’o goes down injured again, we’ll need someone to come in off the bench and I don’t think Ezquerro (who I forgot above) is up for the challenge.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • john |  July 24th, 2007 at 12:54 pm

    cornercorner

    The more I think about this, the more upset I get. Isaiah, your logic is perfectly sound, and I agree with your prognosis. Here’s the problem: Henry should not be a back-up at this stage in his career. In fact, I find it outrageous to even suggest it.

    Perhaps the fact that he spent a good portion of last year off the pitch, nursing an injury, has allowed some people to forget what an electric and supremely gifted talent he is. using him as a back-up is a crime against the sport, and lovers of the game world wide will be the punished; only Barca fan’s and front office could be content with this arrangement, and everyone else - the team and Henry included - will regret the decision.

    The fact of the matter is that the same is true of all the rest of the front four. And actually, Gudjohnson (as you pointed out, Isaiah) is an extremely talented player who probably should be a part of some team’s starting XI. The matter with Barca, at present, is that they’re hoarding the world’s talent, even when they can’t use them effectively. (The same could be said of Inter, for that matter.)

    finally Rijkaard worked out a “theoretical” starting XI today, and guess who was left out? Deco! In a way, it’s somewhat satisfying to think that Barca will have to lie in the bed the they made, with a cluster of talent bumbling up against eachother’s varying styles of play, while the defense is ravaged by counter strikes - but I consider the situation to be nothing short of tragic. Maybe I’m taking this a bit far. I’ll cool off eventually. But still…

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Nolan |  July 24th, 2007 at 2:03 pm

    cornercorner

    My thoughts:

    1. RHEM definitely should NOT play together. There is nothing wrong with attacker rotation and substitution. Remember what happened when Larsson was used as a sub? If times were different we could play Ronaldinho in a Rivaldo role, but we can’t assume that Ronnie remembered how to run.

    2. Our midfield needs to be very flexible. Edmilson is out for quite a while but Marquez is more than decent DM, he’s worth keeping around for that maybe even more than as a CB. Toure is not a true DM and while I think a Toure, Deco, Xavi/Iniesta midfield will be great, against certain teams, especially in Europe, I think a Marquez, Toure, and Iniesta trio would be awesome (Iniesta ideally over Deco and Xavi because he has by far the best on the ball movement of the three) although I’m not sure if Rijkaard would be willing to do that.

    3. Our defence is pretty self explanatory. ZPMA (Replace P with T for the first month) is an obvious first choice, I wish the rest of the team was that easy to figure out.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • John Mayer |  July 24th, 2007 at 9:50 pm

    cornercorner

    Hi guys, I am a different John. I am the one who suggested the 1st 11 in the previous post. I shall call myself John Mayer.
    Like many Barca fans, I am worried about having so many stars in the team. It’s going to be tough to keep everyone happy. My suggestion would be to keep last seasons players happy first. Anyway here is my anagram..
    Forward line-REM (Ronnie, Eto, Messi)
    Midfield - DXT (Deco, Xavi , Toure)
    Defence - VZAP M (Valdes, Zambro, Abi, Puyol & Mili)
    Our defence is awesome don’t you think ‘VZAP M’ he he
    Cheers!!

    Posted from United Arab Emirates United Arab Emirates

    cornercorner
  • John Mayer |  July 24th, 2007 at 9:53 pm

    cornercorner

    May be midfield Shud be XTD

    Posted from United Arab Emirates United Arab Emirates

    cornercorner
  • Sid |  July 25th, 2007 at 1:17 am

    cornercorner

    This is a difficult situation to be in. and i agree that defence seems to be easiest puzzle to solve here with ZAPM. There are enough replacements in the defence too and for the first few months, Puyol`s injury leaves the place open for Thuram and marquez(who is more valuable as a holding midfielder in my opinion).

    Front line of attack is so difficult to figure out here. We have Henry, Eto`o, Messi, Ronaldinho, Gudjohnsson. This is without even counting the attacking talent goldmine coming up from our youth ranks like Dos Santos, Krkic etc. My suggestion here is to go for try out 4-4-2 and 3-5-3 formations sometimes to accumulate the players optimally. if that doesnt work out too well, then 4-3-3 with rotation to figure out the best combo. In 4-3-3 and 3-4-3, i wud prefer the front three to be Henry(drifting left), Eto`o and Messi with others coming in at rotation and substitution.In 4-4-2, i wud prefer the front 2 to be Henry and Eto`o with Krkic playing ocassionally. Bojan must be incorporated smoothly into the team, as he can become the future eto`o of barca.

    As for the midfield, we need to go for semi-defensive or offensive according to the need. First, Toure should be tested out in the holding role supporting the defenders. If he does a better job than Marquez and Edmilson then good for us. In a 4-3-3, i wud prefer Xavi,Toure and Deco as the semi-defensive, while Xavi, Iniesta and Deco as offensive formation. In 3-5-3, i wud prefer xavi, toure, deco,iniesta and marquez. In 4-4-2, I wud prefer Ronaldinho, Iniesta, Deco, Messi as the offensive while Ronnie, Toure, Deco, Messi as the semi-defensive. I personally prefer Iniesta over every other midfielder. i feel he has loads to offer in the future if given opportunity.

    Lastly, i wud feel happier with a better goalkeeper than Valdes.

    Posted from India India

    cornercorner
  • Nolan |  July 25th, 2007 at 4:49 pm

    cornercorner

    Valdes is the second best Spanish goalkeeper, Last Season (In La Liga, the CL is obviously another story) he was out only faultless player.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Nolan |  July 25th, 2007 at 4:55 pm

    cornercorner

    I forgot to add that another reason shelling out money for a keeper is a waste is because we just got a 17 year old Basque keeper who is supposed to be extremely promising, and considering our history with Basque keepers includes Urruti and Zubizarreta, the two greatest keepers in FC Barcelona history, I’m glad we didn’t shell out millions for Ustari.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Sid |  July 25th, 2007 at 9:59 pm

    cornercorner

    that`s good news Nolan. can u tell me more about this 17 yr old keeper. i hope he is really good

    Just to state my opinion, Valdes is the 7 th best goalkeeper from spain after casillas, Reina , Canizarres etc.

    Posted from India India

    cornercorner
  • Bobby G |  July 26th, 2007 at 1:51 pm

    cornercorner

    Reina? Reina!!? Sid, you gotta be kidding me. Canizares, yes — although he’s past his prime. And Casillas, certainly. But ask some Liverpool fans what they think of Reina. Everybody I’ve asked think he’s distinctly mediocre. Valdez is better than that.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Sid |  July 26th, 2007 at 9:49 pm

    cornercorner

    well Reina did give liverpool it`s highest run of clean sheets in Epl and has won them matches on Shootouts (champs league and fa cup). i fel we let goa good talent in him. I agree Valdes has put in good performances when inspired. Infact, the year we won the champs league, he managed to save same shot from Henry which Casillas wasnt able to few matches back. as for Canizarres, though he is past his prime, still he is a veteran. Just see how he pushes the ball all the way out to prevent rebounds. Hell, even Pinto in his old age appears to be better keeper than valdes. why did we have to be so unfortunate in this department?

    Posted from India India

    cornercorner
  • Bobby G |  July 27th, 2007 at 5:02 am

    cornercorner

    It’s not fair to blame a ‘keeper for all goals let in — just as it is wrong to credit a ‘keeper with all clean sheets.

    But if you must use clean sheeets as the yardstick, consider this: Barca had 15 clean cheets last season. Only one team did better — La Coruna, with 16. Madrid had only 11 clean sheets. Valdes did a lot better than Casillas on that score. (Valencia had 14 clean sheets.)

    Plus, in the two seasons previous to last year, Barca led the table in clean sheets. That’s impressive consistency.

    Liverpool had 20 clean sheets last year, but that’s in a different league — one where there were much fewer goals scored overall.

    Besides, Reina had the advantage of having a superb defence in front of him, limiting the number of opportunities for the opposition to approach his goal. Valdes, on the other hand, had to cope with a leaky defence that allowed the opposition more shots on goal.

    Understand that I don’t rate Valdes alongside Buffon or Petr Cech. Those guys are gods. And in a previous note, I pointed out that Valdes let us down in a couple of crucial games. But so did Ronnie, Eto’o, Puyol … almost everybody in the team. Valdes’s record over the past three seasons is certainly world-class. And even by your own yardstick, it is clear that he’s one of Spain’s top two ‘keeepers.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Linda |  July 28th, 2007 at 7:15 am

    cornercorner

    Amen, Bobby.

    Isaiah, I agree largely with your analysis. Much as it is sacrilege to say so, I kind of wish we hadn’t bought Henry. As you pointed out, we didn’t need to improve our goalscoring.

    Very pleased with our other purchases, especially since the back-line seems to pick itself now.

    Another point: it’s important to have Gio and Bojan in the first team. Considering the amount of games we have to play, having backup for REMT is vital. Guddy’s fine, but he’s no lethal finisher, and he certainly can’t play on the wing, and Ezquerro’s probably leaving.

    Posted from Australia Australia

    cornercorner
  • Sid |  July 29th, 2007 at 10:13 pm

    cornercorner

    u r bang on target, bobby, when u say that it wasnt only valdes but other players who let the team down on important occassions. I`m biting my own words, but lets just take away the statistics. do u really think Valdes is such a good keeper? He is an average shot stopper, he is prone to allowing rebounds because he doesnt push the ball all the way out, he is below average on one to one situation, prone to blunders and good on reflex saves most of the time. that`s not such a decent mixture of qualities in my opinion. If you compare Casillas and Barca, pls keep in mind that Casillas had to do with terrible (i mean really terrible)defense and also not much dominance by the team overall. On the contrary, for the two seasons before last, barca played a really dominating game with good possesion.

    Posted from India India

    cornercorner
  • Bobby G |  July 30th, 2007 at 5:42 am

    cornercorner

    Sid, I don’t think Valdez is in Casillas’s class — more’s the pity. But to suggest that little Victor is the “7th best in La Liga” (as you did) is simply unfair. I’m suggesting he’s the 2nd best, now that Canizares is getting long in the tooth.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Joep |  August 7th, 2007 at 2:11 am

    cornercorner

    As long as Iniesta and Xavi play, I’m a happy fan.

    Posted from Netherlands Netherlands

    cornercorner
Shopping at SOCCER.COM Helps Your Club

Comments are closed


Offside RSS Feeds

Search The Offside


 

rounded_corners



Categories


rounded_corners
Euro 2008

Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email barcelona[at]theoffside[dot]com

Related Links


Write for The Offside

LATEST COMMENTS


Archives