

L’escut del Barça
By: Isaiah | December 2nd, 2008A day or two ago, reader Andrew asked what was going on with Atletico Madrid’s crest (a bear and a strawberry tree? Say what?) and Anthony Al over on the Atletico blog kindly responded with a full post explaining el Oso y el Madroño. Reader Ursus checked in with some ursine links of his own (here and here).
However, it’s not like Andrew was going to stop there and just wonder about Atletico’s crest. Not here, not at the Barça Offside, dedicated 24/7 to the blaugrana. For those of you who don’t know where the club’s crest (also called a shield) came from or just want to refresh their memory, Andrew did a bit of research. Thanks a bunch, Andrew, for looking all this stuff up. [Ed note: I've rewritten some of it, but it's mostly Andrew's work; for instance, I corrected his crazy British spellings.]
The club’s first crest (1899-1910) used the city of Barcelona’s coat of arms with a few decorative additions: a diamond divided into four quarters, two displaying the St. George’s cross while the other two each displayed two of the four red stripes of the Catalan flag (senyera). This was framed by a branch of a laurel tree, a branch of a palm tree and a crown with a bat on top of it.* This crest remained in place until 1910, when the club decided it needed its own badge.
Back to the crest, in 1910 a competition was held by the club in which interested members could submit proposals of a new crest. The competition was won by Carles Comamala, a player on the team from 1902 until 1912.** His entry looks very similar to the one that’s used today:

The St. George cross (Sant Jordi in Catalan) which appears in the top left corner of the crest is used because Sant Jordi is the patron saint of Catalonia; he was a soldier of the Roman Empire and a Christian martyr who, after canonization, was adopted as the patron saint of the Crown of Aragon, thus the connection to Barcelona.
Legend has it that the four red bars of the Catalan flag, which graces the upper right corner of the crest, were drawn on Count Wilfred the Hairy’s golden shield by King Charles the Bald’s fingers, after they were dipped in the blood from the count’s war wounds during the siege of Barcelona in 897. In case you’re unfamiliar with the history of the senyera, check out the fairly thorough (if poorly written) Wiki page. It gives quite a few possibilities for the flag’s origins (including the commonly held opinion above), if nothing concrete.
Since Comamala’s initial entry, the most significant change to the club crest that took place was the replacement of the club’s initials, FCB (Futbol Club de Barcelona), which feature in a band across the center of the crest, with CFB (Club de Futbol de Barcelona). This was the official Spanish name of the club, as opposed to the Catalan FCB. The change was enforced by the Franco dictatorship in an attempt to downplay Catalan culture and identity. The four red stripes were also reduced to two in order to remove the Catalan flag from the crest.
It was on the clubs 50th anniversary in 1949 that the four red bars were reinstituted but it was not until 1974 when the club finally reclaimed its original lettering of FCB thus restoring the crest to its original 1910 state.
The present crest is an adaptation by designer Claret Serrahima which he created in 2002 in order to simplify its presentation in order that it may be easier for the club’s corporate identity to be reproduced in many different formats.

Sources:
FC Barcelona Official Site - The Crest
FC Barcelona Official Site - The Colors
Wikipedia: FC Barcelona (Catalan - English);
—–
*Perhaps a native Catalan can help us out a bit here…Do laurel branches, palm trees, crowns, and bats symbolize Catalan identity? If so, how? (for instance, the bald eagle supposedly represents the US because it’s a powerful bird of prey, though Ben Franklin disagreed; bats are also used in Valencia’s crest, what’s up with that?)
**On a side note, one of the theories the club espouses as possibly why the team’s colors are blaugrana is because of “the mother of the Comamala brothers supplied the players with red and blue sashes so that they could differentiate between each other in the days before they had a kit of their own.” (source) If that’s true, well, we owe that family quite a debt of gratitude, huh?
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



Isaiah, I have a lot of Cleveland friends and am also fond of Great Lakes. I hate the Yankees and Yankee Stadium but they do serve Brooklyn Brewery beers there, which is a good enough standby if not as good as some of the others you mentioned.
So I’m curious, do stadium-goers in Europe get better food and drink? What do they eat? I was in Barcelona this summer, but it was tragically not football season so I didn’t get to find out for myself what Catalans eat when attending sporting events.
Not saying I’m above some salted peanuts and miller lites in paper cups. I kind of like it actually.
Posted from
United States

-



Hip Hip Hooray for the Great Lakes Brewery. You may be a merengue, John, but you’ve just won my heart.
Posted from
United States

-



inNYC, I hate Brooklyn Brewery with a burning, burning passion. Never once have I had a single one of their beers (and I’ve had 5 or 6 kinds) and not gone away without disgust. I’ll take Miller Lite over Brooklyn any day of the week.
Spanish beer is crap. Estrella, Volldamm (sp?) etc are horrible beers.
Posted from
United States

-



inNYC, do you know where I can get Great Lakes beer here in NY? I’ve got a place in Brooklyn (American Distributors) over on Court St. in Carrol Gardens/Downtown/whatever that area is called these days that doesn’t carry it, but the owner says “any day now” every time I ask.
Posted from
United States

-



You could try Bierkraft on 5th Ave in Brooklyn although I don’t remember seeing it there. They do have Ipswich beers which are some of my favorites. I have bought kegs from American. They seem pretty on top of it. They’ll probably get it soon if they say so.
Yeah I had a hard time with beer in Spain. Everything else was good though.
Posted from
United States

-



Ipswich is pretty good, I agree. I think I’ve been to Bierkraft, actually. Bought a couple of something or others. Ah time, how you have a way of blurring everything. Their website returns no Great Lakes.
Kevin leaves and look what happens to the Barça talk: right out the window.
Posted from
United States

-



talking about beer is on par with talking barca… both have me salivating… for the next brew and/or game.
count me in the great lakes and bell’s fan club.
Posted from
United States

-



the difference between having the unicef logo on the shirts as opposed to no logos, is more than advertising for unicef. barca actually pays unicef about 2 million euros a year for the privelige of wearing their logo. barca and unicef team up in africa a lot and have built tonnes of schools , soccer training camps, hospitals etc in many african countries. i have seen the one in swaziland and it is amazing what they have built for these children. i would take the unicef logo over no logo anyday.
Posted from
United States

-



i think the “mes” thing is a good idea. i dont care if you could barely see the colours of the barca shirt if it meant that they were covered in sponsorships that are giving money to refugees and kids who really needed it.
are you guys really going to tell me that aethetics are more important than starving children?
this isnt a first-world dilemma of how the kit looks, its a question of moral and ethical weight and i think that as a huge multi-million dollar brand, barca is leading the way by demonstrating a sense of corporate resonsibility. like someone said, look at manyoo and their AIG sponsorship. its all about the money there.
this is why barca is more than a club. bring on the sponsirships and lets help as many kids as we can!
Posted from
United States

-



last thing about the “mes” is that it wont be appearing on the actual players shirts i dont think, i just think fans have the option of buying barca shirts with the logo on it to show their own support.
Posted from
United States

-



Way to get off topic there, Andrew…
I for one love the Unicef logo. It’s such a brilliant addition. The reason I’m not so into the Més thing is because it’s attached to Nike. Perhaps that foolish of me, perhaps not.
I love that Barcelona took the initiative alone to put Unicef on their jerseys. I love that Barcelona wore Malaria No More patches in the preseason (and I wish they were still wearing them). I would be in favor of putting Més on the sleeves as well. It is part aesthetics, of course, but also because I think that Unicef is a better organization that what Més appears to be and as such should be given precedence on the jersey.
I think it would be wrong to plaster the jersey in logos for awesome organizations because they would blend together and the message would be lost. However, I think the billboard advertisements behind the players on the field (along the sidelines, etc) could be for these organizations (UNHCR is totally rad and should receive our support, as should the International Red Cross, Doctors Without Borders, Potters for Peace, and like a bajillion other groups).
By the way, in this pic from the Més presentation, doesn’t Yaya look like he’s going to eat poverty or at least remove its manhood, dump it in a trashcan and mosey on home for a pint of refreshing Valencia ass kicking? Yeah, I have a mancrush.
Posted from
United States

-



i just want to clarify what i mean above.
i was speaking fairly metaphorically. i of course, do not think it would be good to plaster the shirt with logos. it would look stupid and besides, the more logos you have on the shirt, the less attention you pay to each one individually.
i think these logos could have other places, for example on the advertising boards around the pitch, on the players warm up kit, on the game program and other things like that, perhaps even on the sleeve.
its more the idea of the sponsorships that i think is important and giving money to these kids that need it.
but as i type this i see above that you already said all this isaiah, so i guess to sum it up, i agree with you, i think i just didnt express myself very well. i over exagerated to make a point.
Posted from
United States

-



i like the plain jersey, but dont mind the unicef logo there. and when i mean plain, i mean in general, i dont mean that i condone the atrocity that is our home jersey this year; nike dropped the ball this year. its TOO simple!
yeah, isaiah, i was gonna mention that Kxevin woudlnt approve of our beer talk. So, kevin says he looks like Thuram… no wonder everyone is affraid to go off topic when he is around.
where i work we serve 4 spanish beers; Alhambra, Alhambra Negra, Estrella Galicia, Estrella Damm. are any of those anygood? hvnt actually tried them myself.
Posted from
United States

-



Personally, I want the no-logo shirt back, partly because it’s tradition (the farest I would go is to put on some charity logo in away games) and partly because I believe in the Unicef curse, as in: we are punished for being too good.
P.S. Belgian beers are the best in the world, thank you very much.
Posted from
Belgium

-



Isaiah, in that pic you linked, did you or anyone else notice Bojan staring and giving a goofy look to the camera, and how kid-ish he looks? It’s pretty funny.
Personally I love the Unicef logo. It is a big part of why we are globally seen as “more than a club” (as I think someone pointed out above), and it gives us a great public image. Apart from the business side, it makes me feel good wearing my jersey with the logo on it.
Apparently our end-of-season targets are Fabregas and Benzema. They would cost a crapload, but God knows they are great players. And we should be able to get them cheaper than most clubs. Apparently we have first option on Fabregas (according to his ex-agent), so if Arsenal have another terrible season, then he may well ask to leave. And I think that we can safely assume that we have some kind of priority on Benzema. We have apparently been working on a transfer for him for the past few years, and we’ve been told that he wants us (according to Txiki).
I still think that we would be signing both of them a season too early. Eto’o is still in his prime, and Benzema can’t sit on the bench like Henry does. Cesc is also not a bench player, and Xavi is getting better every game. Both need a season to blend into the team, because they will be replacing some key roles, but we still have world class players in top form for those positions. But if both players understand and are happy with it, then we should go for it. And about a thousand clubs want Benzema, so while we may have preference, we still need to make a move.
Posted from
Australia

-



Oh and if we can’t get Cesc, I vote that we do whatever we can to get Hamsik from Napoli. He is a phenomenal player, and would thrive with Toure, as he wouldn’t be getting the crap kicked out of him.
Posted from
Australia

-



Boca also has unicef on their kits, its on the sleeves. so actually we are not the only club which does this.
Posted from
United States

-



cesc wont come in summer due to being the arsenal captain now. he said he wants to stay. also i think if benzema comes it will only be because eto’o will leave. i dont think we will have both.
on other sites its as if eto’o has already said he is leaving and people are talking about how to replace him.
EE said they arent going for benxzema because of hunterlaar now so we have a good shot at him. personally i prefer eto’o.
on a side note, i am off to buy my xbox (finally) and fifa 09, is anybody interested in playing online? maybe if we have enough players we could have a barca offside team. i know isaiah has fifa 09, so anyone else?
Posted from
United States

-



apparently benzema is a madridista fan. hmmm thinking twice now
Posted from
United States

-



Colin: I too live in Philly and was hoping to find a Barca bar/pub to catch matches. I have really only gone to the Dark Horse to watch EPL matches and a handful of Barca matches, but it’s pretty empty when Barca are playing. Any interest in hitting up a pub on Saturday to catch the Valencia match. I initially planned to watch it at the Dark Horse, but I’m open to suggestions.
Posted from
United States

-



If anyone wants to connect via these here internets, just mutually post your desire to get in touch and I will email you both (or however many there are) so that you can get both email addresses without having to share those email address in public.
Posted from
United States

-



Forget Benzema, while we’re getting Cesc, lets see if we can get Wenger to part ways with Carlos Vela. He’s better than Bojan i.m.o.
Posted from
United States

-



But Carlos Vela is Mexican. I can only stand so many archrivals on my club team. I get so much shit from my friends (who are Mexican) for Rafa Marquez being blaugrana while we’re watching USA-Mexico and I’m dissing their team.
Posted from
United States

-



sorry Isaiah, my name proabalby masks this, but im Mexican, so i wouldnt mind vela joining the squad! gio leaving was sad :’-(
worry not, there wont be any americans in Barca anytime soon. (unless this FCB Miami works out, and we can steal really young ones and give them some proper training)
I actually root for both teams, (Mexico, and U.S.)unless they play eachother, then it’s all Mexico. but both teams are rather un-impressive as of late. Mexico has an excuse though; Eriksson is our Manager! He kept insitsing on the Gio-Vela tandem when it was blatantly clear that they dont have the experience to play with eachother at the senior level. He should have paired Gio with an older striker (Bravo?) or Vela with an older forward (Blanco, Bautista?). Eriksson is crap!
Anyways… im pretty sure everyone else cares very little for the U.S. / Mexico rivalry.
Posted from
United States

-



Kyle: I’m up for watching some Barca matches at Dark Horse, but I can’t make it for the Valencia match. Maybe next week against the EE?
Posted from
United States

Read the rest of the comments
Comments are closed













