Preview: Champions League semi-final, Barca v Chelsea. 1:45 p.m. CT, ESPN2

By: Kevin | April 27th, 2009

Here he is, ladies and gentlemen, the key to our Champions League hopes against Chelsea, a player whose recent run of form has reduced even Lionel Messi to open-mouthed astonishment.

Yes, it’s our very own translucent gem of a midfielder, Andres Iniesta.

Is everybody ready? I hope so, because it’s GO TIME!

There have been predictions, including all those British types who say that Chelsea is going to put it to us, that we’ve been poncing around in the Liga, and against Champions League opponents who haven’t really been our equal, such as Lyon and Bayern.

Are they right?

The obvious answer, to our worldview, is no. Hell, no, not even close.

Guardiola says “I have 100 percent faith in my squad.” Who are we to argue with that, because In Pep We Trust.

Standard line, being uttered by everyone, is that the tie will be decided at Stamford Bridge. Which is probably true. But I also know that if we play the way that we’re capable, we can decide the tie tomorrow, by putting a 3-0 or 4-0 hurting on Chelsea.

Likely? No. Because as much as Guus Hiddink (who is 1-7 against Barca lifetime) talks about playing an open game, I just don’t see it happening. He’d be crazy if he did, particularly with likely Ashley Cole replacement Bosingwa facing off against Messi. Yes, that’s Jose “Studs Up, What Hamstring Injury” Bosingwa, which should give some indication as to how serious Hiddink is about playing a straight-up match. I’ll expect Messi to be rocking the back of calf pads tomorrow.

In my worldview, there are a number of key matchups, but few as important as these:

Iniesta vs Chelsea defenders: Becasue of his roaming style, Ghostface pops up all over the pitch. His play will be crucial to us. The better he plays, the better we roll. Sevilla might have been his best match of the season, and it was a destruction. He can do the same to anyone, anywhere. Chelsea will be desperate to keep him out of the box, where his distribution to attackers has been off the charts.

Xavi vs Michael Essien: No offense to Liverpool supporters, but Xavi is no Steven Gerrard. He has better ball skills, better dribbling ability and better possession skills. If Essien tries to man-mark Xavi, I expect at least one card from him in the match. Essien is about the best box-to-box midfielder in the world right now. He marked Gerrard off the pitch. But Xavi is just a different matter because of the constant movement that is such a big part of his game.

Thierry Henry vs Branislav Ivanovic: If Chelsea can mark Henry with one man, it will make the jobs of Terry and Alex much easier in the center of the defense. If Henry has a good match, suddenly it tips the balance in favor of us, because an on-form Henry demands two men. This is in addition to the three on Messi, Essien on Xavi and two for Iniesta. And what about Eto’o?

Gerard Pique vs Didier Drogba: If Guardiola doesn’t start Pique, he’s out of his mind. I’m looking for a probable center pairing of Marquez and Pique. Guardiola, I think, knows of Puyol’s recent funk, and Chelsea don’t really have a real threat, should he decide to put Puyol at left back. Though why he would do that when we have a healthy Abidal is beyond me.

Messi is going to be good. He’s never had two bad matches in a row, and why would he start now? He’s always excelled on the big stage, and this is one of the biggest. The Yaya is rested and ready, and could provide significant help not only for Xavi, but against that Route One attack of which Chelsea is so proud.

Now, that’s all well and good, but the most critical thing in this match is not to concede. Give Chelsea an away goal or two rolling into Stamford Bridge, and it makes us have to chase the tie, which opens up our lines and puts the defenders in danger. Drogba is playing too well for us to allow that to happen.

Here’s our likely starting XI: Valdes, Alves, Marquez, Pique, Abidal (Puyol would surprise me, but not too much), The Yaya, Xavi, Iniesta, Messi, Henry, Eto’o. This is, right now, our strongest lineup. It’s also a lineup that has Puyol and Alves one yellow each away from missing the return leg, which is why I think we’ll see Abidal. He is never more certain than when he is at home, and Puyol will be important for that away leg, as he doesn’t rattle at key times.

This match could wind up 0-0, or 5-0, frankly. It depends on which Chelsea shows up. We have the player and ball pace to disrupt their back line. Yes, John Terry is still a top-class defender, but I’d take an on-form Messi against anyone in the world.

We can expect long shots to test Valdes, and long balls to test the resolve of the back line. Lampard and Alex are excellent free kick takers, and as with all top Premiership sides, Chelsea can be punishing on set pieces. Not giving up fouls in dangerous places will be critical, and Alves will have to rein in his tendency to give up cheap corners.

My prediction? 3-1 us. I think that Drogba is playing too well to be kept out of goal. For us, Messi, Henry and Eto’o will tally.

P.S. Another great thing about that Henry goal to make it 2-2 Valencia is that we can go all out against Chelsea, knowing that we can lose at the Bernabeu and still come out with the Liga lead, by a point. Then the Liga schedule relaxes a bit in opponent quality. Villarreal will play us tough, but we’re at home for that one. But the lads won’t get a full week’s rest until after the Copa finals.

And that’s life.

P.P.S. If anyone wants to run the LiveBlog, let me know via e-mail, kevvwill@yahoo.com.






Subscribe
 

rss_icon The Offside RSS Feeds

Print
Print article
Share
del.icio.us:Preview: Champions League semi-final, Barca v Chelsea. 1:45 p.m. CT, ESPN2 digg:Preview: Champions League semi-final, Barca v Chelsea. 1:45 p.m. CT, ESPN2 reddit:Preview: Champions League semi-final, Barca v Chelsea. 1:45 p.m. CT, ESPN2 fark:Preview: Champions League semi-final, Barca v Chelsea. 1:45 p.m. CT, ESPN2 Y!:Preview: Champions League semi-final, Barca v Chelsea. 1:45 p.m. CT, ESPN2 stumbleupon:Preview: Champions League semi-final, Barca v Chelsea. 1:45 p.m. CT, ESPN2

Comments  

    Displaying the most recent 25 comments from a total of 138 comments.
    Read the rest of the comments

  • Tajh |  April 28th, 2009 at 4:50 pm

    cornercorner

    Well all i can say is that every team has its own philosophy and Chelsea’s own is to kick the ball downward,hope something happens, and defend like bitches when its to hot for them to handle.

    But i don’t blame them cuz its a competition an every1 wants to win.I’m just glad that a so called big four had to rely on doing this to stop a Non-Epl team and at least some reports are bashing Chelsea for defending like regulation struggling teams.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Ahsan |  April 28th, 2009 at 4:56 pm

    cornercorner

    SB:

    No. I define “courage” as “playing the way you always play”. The Italian teams had one style, and they stuck to it irrespective of who their opponent was, so fair play to them, even if it was boring. But Chelsea clearly did not have enough belief in their own talent or system, else why would they change it for the biggest game of the season? Same as United last year.

    Mind, Liverpool didn’t change their style too much in 07 when they beat us on away goals. That’s worthy of some respect. So it’s not all English teams, just the scared ones.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • jordi |  April 28th, 2009 at 4:59 pm

    cornercorner

    If we had won 2-0, their media would still praise them for spirited defending, and limiting us to only 2 goals.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Ciaran |  April 28th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    cornercorner

    I was surprised that Chelsea didn’t try to score an away goal as it is vital in European competition.
    There is no longer a ‘home advantage’ in two legged affairs, rather a home disadvantage.
    At home you have to be cautious.

    A 0-0 against a team that played as negatively as Chelsea did is a good result. Would Liverpool have gotten 4 if Chelsea played like that? No.
    Tonight Chelsea played 3 defensive midfielders, 2 ‘attacking’ midfielders and Drogba chasing down the defenders meaning that they had virtually no attacking threat except for 1 mistake that Marquez made.

    At Stamford Bridge, Chelsea cannot play like that, sitting back and soaking up pressure, because if they concede then they go out.
    They have to attack and attempt to control the ball more. As we have seen for the past 50 matches, no one can control the ball against us.

    One thing that is for sure, we will have to score and keep things very tight. If we score first then it will be all but over.

    Posted from Ireland Ireland

    cornercorner
  • Ciaran |  April 28th, 2009 at 5:06 pm

    cornercorner

    By the way, if that match was a one legged tie, I imagine we would have won by 3 goals, such was the clear difference in quality between the two teams

    Posted from Ireland Ireland

    cornercorner
  • SB |  April 28th, 2009 at 5:12 pm

    cornercorner

    Citizen – ah, but now everything comes crashing down: who said I was a chelsea fan?

    The debate that you should be having in your head right now about whether I am a chelsea fan or not and the reasons for me being here if I’m not is a perfect analogy to my point on “anti-football”.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • SB |  April 28th, 2009 at 5:20 pm

    cornercorner

    Ahsan – is it courageous to rigidly stick to only one system of playing? I’m not so sure many people would agree with you on that. Ideology is one thing, but dogmatism is another.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • T U |  April 28th, 2009 at 5:31 pm

    cornercorner

    @SB… you need to shut up and go back to the Chelsea website. Nobody cares what you think… All of us Barca supporters have two words!!! Visca Barca!

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • SB |  April 28th, 2009 at 5:33 pm

    cornercorner

    Oh, well seeing as you asked so politely…

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • jordi |  April 28th, 2009 at 5:59 pm

    cornercorner

    I was looking at the replay of bojan’s chance, and it seemed like leo was in a good position just behind him for a volley, maybe he should have called for bojan to leave the chance, or maybe he thought bojan couldnt miss from 4 yards. Credit to bojan for getting in the great postion though, too bad he just couldnt keep it down.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • OhYes |  April 28th, 2009 at 6:12 pm

    cornercorner

    Both Iniesta and Pep talked bad about Chelsea’s game.

    “I do not know if we will lift a cup in the end, but I can assure you that we will go on holiday without any regrets and without people saying we should have any.” – Guardiola

    Good words!

    Xavi also had good things to say (Before the match): “We go everywhere to win, from minute one and even more with this coach. He demands we always play to win from the start.”

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • raj |  April 28th, 2009 at 7:02 pm

    cornercorner

    firstly i like to congratulate chelsea for their excellent defending in tonights game. It is somewhat funny to me that with all the banter about the EPL being the best league in the world and the top four english sides dominating europe, that last years champions league winner and runners up both have to opt for the most anti-football tactics when playing against barcelona. I think chelsea supports should all be unhappy with the tactics employed in tonights game as we all know that they can play an attacking style yet resort to gutter football instead.

    Posted from Australia Australia

    cornercorner
  • Jason |  April 28th, 2009 at 7:02 pm

    cornercorner

    at SB, you are welcome here whenever. most of us try to keep it civil, so dont let one person ruin that for you. please come back, as all of us love a good footy debate.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • OhYes |  April 28th, 2009 at 7:05 pm

    cornercorner

    It’s football. And it’s a CL semi final game. There are going to be harsh words if things don’t go as we want them to.

    We’re normally welcoming and nice people, though. :)

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • anand |  April 28th, 2009 at 7:28 pm

    cornercorner

    I have a very good feeling about this match. A draw is not a bad result. The only worry is the weekend back line. The boys can approach the EE game with a fresh challenge, a win will be ideal. But even if we draw, it will keep the league lead intact and to face chelsea away at Standford bridge will be a good time. Although i fear the fatigue and travel may take its toll. Well we all knew it anyways. Messi will have a better match on the return leg. He just cannot have this long bad spells. I hope he will fire in all cylinders at the Bernabau and carry on the good work at SB. Yaya is a man mountain and he is so underrated in the world media. It was so elegant to watch our midfield retain possession and our forward line play frustrating ping ball football.
    Kudos to Valdes…he stepped it up at the big stage and saved the match for us. Pique was excellent. The guy has progressed leaps and bounds this season.

    Before the match the English commentators kept saying Barca is not tested yet and that Barca would not be at the top of the table had they be playing in EPL. Well i hoped to believe that…but at the end of the match it was pretty clear to me that there are no equals out there to test us.
    Winning or loosing is just a matter of details.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • nattsmash |  April 28th, 2009 at 7:28 pm

    cornercorner

    As a chelsea fan, i’m not concerned that our performance was ‘anti-football’ or boring, as long as it works and we get results. Sure it would be nice to play expansive attacking football every single game, but if we had done that against barca you probably would have beaten us. You have to adapt your game to your opponents, whats the point in playing exciting football and getting beaten? there is too much at stake in top class football to just try and please the purists. Saying all that, i think not getting an away goal will hurt us and we have a huge task in beating Barca ‘proper’ at the Bridge.

    Posted from Australia Australia

    cornercorner
  • T U |  April 28th, 2009 at 7:48 pm

    cornercorner

    Sorry, just had a “Yaya” moment there… but everyone is entitled to their opinion. Keepin’ it civil!!

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Citizen |  April 28th, 2009 at 7:55 pm

    cornercorner

    @SB again,

    I don’t understand your analogy; can you please explain it? It is perfectly reasonable to assume that a user who posts for the first time at a Barcelona fan site after a match against Chelsea and happens to have a pro-Chelsea slant (irrespective of whether that slant is justified or not) is also a Chelsea fan. If not, please correct me.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • IceMel |  April 28th, 2009 at 8:22 pm

    cornercorner

    OK, there was some good Chelsea defending, but there was some bad mojo or nerves or fatigue or something everytime we got 25 yards from goal. Where were, at least, the shots off the bar? We played like ourselves in the midfield (and a bit like an EPL team at times too) but there were no fire-crackers in the boots in the final 3rd.

    Alves had a few M-80s with those crosses late in the game, but the kindling was already damp.

    On my little laptop SPF45 seemed to dive a few times (hard to tell when he’s the size of a “worker” carpenter ant.) I think he should stay up and just start taking names and hand the list to Queen-Ant-Yaya at half time. “Mess with these MANDIBLES punks!”

    Yaya played 2 games today: one “perfect-passes-barca-style” and one “you-trip-us-we’ll-trip-you-EPL-style.” I can’t believe the announcers on ESPN360 questioned why he was starting. Does the world not know?

    Interesting days ahead cules. In Pep We Trust.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • OhYes |  April 28th, 2009 at 8:24 pm

    cornercorner

    nattsmash: Barcelona’s mentality is set in stone. For other teams with different goals, sure, the tactics can go from all-out beautiful attack to defending without any form of attack whatsoever.

    But Barcelona’s mentality is that of winning through courage, hard work, style, attack, and tenacity. It’s also about pride and heart.

    Any change in that is like the Catholic church removing the pope, or England getting rid of the queen.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Carlows |  April 28th, 2009 at 8:26 pm

    cornercorner

    I’m sure we will come out on top after the last 90 minutes. Yet, it’s safe to say I’m a little worried. All we can do is support our great team, come next week we’ll go to play at the bridge and in a couple of weeks we’ll go play in Rome. Simple as that, we all know it.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Ahsan |  April 28th, 2009 at 8:31 pm

    cornercorner

    SB:

    What you call dogmatism, I call belief in one’s self and system. No one is saying you can’t make minor changes here and there, tinker around a little bit, but one’s philosophy — if one truly believes in it, and the talent to execute it — should not change wholesale from situation to situation.

    Again, I should emphasize that I don’t have a real problem with the logic of Chelsea’s tactics: they were here to get a 0-0 draw, maybe nick an away goal if they got lucky, and roll the dice at the Bridge. That is fine, as far it goes.

    But what I have a problem with is EPL fans claiming their league is the best. How can their league be the best if the two top teams in the last five years are SO intimidated by us that they completely abandon their style of play? Even Real Madrid, who walked in to the Camp Nou in December in complete and utter disarray (sacked manager in mid week, bad run of results) meeting an absolute rampant Barca team (Barca’s best run this year was probably October to December) played more aggressively (not by much, mind).

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • JC |  April 28th, 2009 at 8:43 pm

    cornercorner

    Guys,
    we need to be more worried about who’s gonna partner Pique in central defence for the return leg.
    Caceres hasn’t played for mroe than 3 months I think, Abidal was horrible the last time i saw him(That was when he played for france against Italy)…….

    Posted from United Arab Emirates United Arab Emirates

    cornercorner
  • Justin |  April 28th, 2009 at 8:51 pm

    cornercorner

    The fact of the matter is, footballing philosophy is, like someone pointed out earlier, very very subjective. What’s great about this world is we are entitled to our own but to impose it on others is what we should be wary of. To deem Chelsea’s tactics as anti-football, or whatever, I think is wrong. They have their own philosophies and objectives, we have ours. It’s our pride that forces us to keep this attacking mentality wherever, and whoever we play. It’s Chelsea’s issue and they have the freedom to play whatever they want.

    From the result’s point of view, Chelsea did well. Organized defense all throughout. But from a fans’ point of view, it made the game really boring. I think this is what frustrates most Barca fans, like me, who have been accustomed to high intensity and very entertaining matches.

    What pisses me off the most is Hiddink saying before the game that we will be playing to win, and we will attack. What a huge liar he turns out to be. =/ I know we can win in a more open game next week at Stamford Bridge. I’m just worried about who’ll play CB with Marquez and Puyol out. Abidal or Caceres maybe?

    Posted from Australia Australia

    cornercorner
  • SB |  April 29th, 2009 at 1:15 am

    cornercorner

    T U – no need to apologize: I wasn’t offended.

    Ahsan – I believe in having faith in one’s principles too, and I don’t think barca should abandon theirs (still, I think that they might need to do something a bit clever). Like I said before, it’s only your belief that one’s playing style should be stuck with. What if chelsea’s philosophy is that any system is acceptable in order to achieve results? In that case, they have stuck to their principles; it’s just that they’re not your principles.

    Citizen – nothing very profound, just that people here (understandably) were quick to deride chelsea for playing anti-football because the thought process they had in the back of their minds was, “That was bad, this is objective truth, thus you were bad to play it.” and all I’m saying is that you shouldn’t look down on how another team plays just because that system doesn’t fit your own philosophy on football. This is analogous to the (equally understandable) assumption that I was a chelsea fan because it would appear to make no sense if I weren’t: you can’t apply your own behaviourisms to someone else. You said it was clear that I was concerned with respect from opponent fans. Perhaps that is true on a deeper level, but only if by “respect” you meant “my definition of respect”. Really, it’s nothing profound: if you still confused, it’s only because I’m not explaining it very well. Besides, this is a football site, so I don’t want to keep harping on about esoteric points on existentialism!

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner

Comments are closed


Spain National Team News

Tickets to upcoming games


Offside RSS Feeds

Search The Offside


 

rounded_corners









Categories


rounded_corners

Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email barcelona[at]theoffside[dot]com

Related Links


Write for The Offside

LATEST COMMENTS


Archives