

Barca 1, Espanyol 2, a.k.a. “And then it was 7.”
By: Kevin | February 21st, 2009
Ye gods, this one felt bad going in. That we let a match of football degenerate into a knife fight means that we deserved what we got, which was a loss.
Espanyol came in 20th in the table. As in rock bottom. As in a one hair off a dog’s ass away from relegation unless they stage a remarkable comeback. And what better time to start than against the top of the table, right, a team that was on the ropes in at their home, requiring a last-gasp penalty to get the win, right? Right?
Right.
My summation of this one can be brief: We didn’t man up, and we didn’t play football, choosing instead to spend all of our time trying to curry favor with the ref, instead of just putting this team away as we should have.
The good thing is that there is lots of culpability to go around here.
The starting XI was good and optimistic: Valdes, Alves, Pique, Marquez, Abidal, Yaya, Keita, Xavi, Henry, Eto’o, Messi. Should have been enough to more than dispatch a struggling defensive side, right?
Not so fast.
Of late, we’ve started to look like last year’s side, in keeping possession until the real danger time comes, giving up a couple of stupid goals, then mounting the “close but no cigar” comeback. And the trends aren’t encouraging, as we are struggling against teams that we should be putting to bed with a blanky and four or five goals, before the half.
But things are different, because it’s a tired side you’re looking at. So everybody holds the ball for too long, passes aren’t as crisp as they once were, the runs aren’t as sharp. Everyone is a footstep away, and it’s a critical one. So the balls that found teammates on the dead run early in the season, are now finding the feet of a defender, or the ball is squirting through to open space, with the runner coming up just short.
It’s a critical difference that accounts for a lot of why we’re been struggling. A week of rest, quite frankly, isn’t enough when the lads are this tired. And the squad depth is suddenly not there, as Hleb, Keita and Krkic aren’t panning out to be what we expected, which was ways to give the likes of Iniesta, Xavi, Henry and Eto’o some quality rest.
So they play….and play….and play. Then Espanyol comes to town, full of hope and energy, and steals one. More correctly, we gave them one. Yes, we pinged the ball around, yes we played much of the first half in their end of the pitch. But really, we never looked like scoring. Ray-Ray can rant all he wants about that Messi cross to Henry early in the half, but by the time that lob got to Henry’s head, Kameni and a defender were there. Ray-Ray needs to cool the hyperbole, but he won’t. Guaranteed.
More worrisome are the missed runs and bad control, all signs of fatigue. The other sign of fatigue, injury, is also cropping up. To be fair, the Evil Empire had its bad spell in the sick bay, and we made hay while the sun shined. Now it appears to be their turn, as a Betis side that we had to come back from two goals down against got spanked 6-1 in the Bernabeu.
Anybody remember those scorelines?
And I’m sure that people will argue all they want about the referee, and the ball being played directly out, and the red card that shouldn’t have been, etc, etc. None of it should have come to that. Espanyol played their hearts out, then got into our heads. We earned the loss, as plain as day.
For my money, the game turned when Abidal went out with the groin injury, and it’s an 8-9 week comeback from that one. Ouch. Ouch, ouch, ouch. That meant that Puyol came in at left back, and it showed for Espanyol’s first goal, as nobody seemed to know what to do. Abidal’s pace means that 3 men back on counterattacks is easy, even if Busquets sticks a foot out to deflect the pass directly to an Espanyol attacker to kick-start their break.
With Puyol in there, as lion-like as his heart is, he’s stuck between a rock and a hard place, not really knowing who to defend and not having the pace to shade the difference. And Yaya, inexplicably, stopped running with the man he was marking, who opened up to score the goal. If Yaya stays home, the goal doesn’t happen because the passer is covered, with nowhere to put the ball.
The second was just an awful mistake from a keeper who in fact played a hell of a match. But those two critical errors are the difference between a 1-0 win and a 2-1 loss, aren’t they? They are also errors that we weren’t making during the run of good, excellent and yes, lucky play that marked the first half of the season for us.
So. Is the league still over? No. With Atletico away next week, and no Abidal, suddenly the pace of the likes of Sinama-Pongolle is distressing. Yet even more distressing is that like last season, we’re dropping points to teams that we aren’t suppposed to be dropping points to. Yes, teams play out of their minds when they play against us. Duh! That’s part of being top.
Am I worried? No. I’m more worried about Abidal. Not being able to walk off the pitch is bad. Really bad. And he’s as critical a part of our side as any attacker or midfielder.
And with that, onward:
Team: 2. They had the opportunity to take the match in hand and put it away in the first half, when Espanyol were on the back foot and just hanging on. Matters were made worse by all the falling down, fouling and letting the opponent get into their heads. Stupid. Yes, the ref sucked. Play through it.
Guardiola: 2. He should have had this team coming out breathing fire. Busquets for Henry? Yes, Henry was playing like crap, but how is Busquets going to improve that attacking situation? The Gudjohnsen for Eto’o sub was also not very inspired, because it meant that we were playing with no forwards, as in zero. Messi isn’t a forward. He let the game get out of control, and didn’t know how to get it back this time.
Valdes: 6. Yes, people are going to howl. But except for that one misplaced clearance, where did he go much wrong? Now he will take a lot of weight for that blunder because it was huge. As in ginormous. No was a 10-man side is coming back from 2-0 down. His concentration should have been sharper than ever.
Alves: 7. Played a hell of a match. Very active on offense and defense. Not his fault people weren’t getting it done at the business end of his passes. He was about the only one who was able to give-and-take with Espanyol and not get out of his game.
Pique: 6. A very strong match for him, as well. Yes we lost and conceded twice, but he actually played well. Pique was all over the place on offense and defense, bringing the ball up, making smart passes and covering well.
Marquez: 4. He hasn’t been the same since coming back from the injury.
Abidal: incomplete. Was on his way to a spectacular match when the injury happened. That’s a tough loss. Early word is a torn abductor muscle in the thigh, out for 8-9 weeks.
Yaya: 4. Alternately active and sluggish. His non-covering of the Espanyol attacker was huge. As in match-turning.
Xavi: 3. Yes, the standard for him is very high. But not in recent memory has he so consistently not lived up to it. He’s just off, on passes, shots, free kicks, you name it.
Keita: 2. No, it wasn’t a red card. Can’t see that one surviving examination by the Liga. But he still sucked. I can’t figure him out. I know what we thought we were buying, but what we have so far is a “t’ain’t,” as in “t’ain’t a real good DM, but t’ain’t a real good attacker, either.”
Messi: 4. No real influence, and he looked tired. He also held the ball too long, and lacks that pinball-like verve that made him so unplayable. Again. Fatigue.
Henry: 2. He is supposed to show up for matches such as this one, as the big-time, veteran presence. I’m sure he knows why he tried to play in Keita, instead of just lifting the ball over Kameni for the 1-0 lead. And while the Messi header took forever to get there, he has to attack that ball, meeting it halfway. He was also lining up offside, and not bothering to get back, another sign on a tired player.
Eto’o: 2. No influence on the match, just like the rest of his front line mates. He let his man take him completely out of the game, so he spent all of his time with the ball bouncing off of his foot, arguing with the ref or bumping against various Espanyol players. Which helps the side how?
Substitutions
Puyol (for Abidal): 4. He played his heart out, but he still isn’t up to full speed. He was coming forward a lot, without the pace to get back. He also should have been more decisive on the first Espanyol goal.
Busquets (for Henry): 3. Here’s the thing, Sergi: If you can’t actually control the ball, sometimes you’re better off just letting it roll past you, rather than throwing off a touch that steers the ball directly to an attacker, starting the opponents’ counterattack.
Gudjohnsen (for Eto’o): 4. Not bad, but he had what could have been two excellent opportunities, but his match-reading was poor, so he was always a step late. The Busquets glancing header could have been an easy tap-in goal, but he was a step away.
Edit: I just noticed that there were some EE fans who visited the preview thread to talk smack. It’s all in fun but you know what? Where were you when the shoe was on the other foot, contributing to discussions in this space even though we were up and you were down? Many of us from this space (me, Ramzi, Isaiah, Hector and a few others), were being positive and contributing to discussions in the EE space when the shoe was on the other foot. But to sashay in and kick a side when it’s down is just bullshit. Yes, I said it. Bullshit.
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



Ribery isn’t the loyal type by the way, he hasn’t been in the same club for more than 2 seasons but I guess that stops once you get into big clubs.
I agree, the Liga seems to regain its lost priority and we all want a big win to give some relief to fans against a side we beat thrice and is willing to do the same =)
I think Liverpool will do real madrid some good(specially the fans)!
Posted from
Switzerland

-



Kxevin, if we bought Ribery, wouldnt that mean tha Iniesta goes to his perfered position of Xavi’s right hand man in the mid?
I actually think that they could light the pitch on fire playing off of eachother like Alves and Messi, and there would be 0 need for an attacking Left fullback. (i agree with Hector, that since alves spends all his time up, our left back shouldnt be so adventorous)
Posted from
United States

-



Ribery would be perfect; Sell Henry and push Iniesta back to his preferred position. Keep Eto’o and buy a tall 2nd striker for those beat the bus games (Lorrente would be excellent).
I am happy to keep Hleb and Keita and give them another season to prove their worth. I would want to keep Abidal, he is a solid player and provides a perfect balance for our back line when Alves goes on his crazy runs. I would still like to buy Lahm though to provide proper depth for our full back positions. He can play either wing which means he could end up playing a lot of games rotating with both Abidal and Alves and also filling in if either get injured. Besides those 3 purchases we wouldnt really need anybody else. We have a lot of prospects coming up from the youth teams and I expect to see more of Bojan next season. Add Milito and Henrique to the mix next season and we would have quite a bit more depth than we do right now.
I would maybe add Asenjo to the list just because he seems to have so much potential and he could be a real gem if we buy him now and cultivate him properly. He would need proper playing time though and not just 5 or 6 games a season. VV would have to accept some competition which he has never really had!
Posted from
United States

-



I dont care about the Champions League…too much luck gets involved in winning the damn thing..
even the Copa has no love from me…all i want is the Liga…two years without is two years too long…give me the Liga and i will be happy..Give me the Liga and it will be back where it belongs..in the trophy cabinet at the Camp Nou
AmenPosted from
India

-



For the game against Lyon we should play
Alves—Pique—Marquez—Puyol
in the back 4 BUT instead of Puyol attacking we would keep him back so when Alves goes on one of his runs (we need to name those runs! everybody uses “crazy runs” right now) we would have 3 CBs. So it would be
Pique—Marquez—Puyol
Alves
Alves
AlvesAnyone agree? Disagree?
Posted from
Armenia

-



Hawk, I disagree. What about Caceres on the left where he plays for Uruguay? That would allow us to rest Pique and have a back line of Alves, Puyol, Marquez, Caceres. If you want to rest Puyol or Marquez, put in Pique for whichever one.
That’s the lineup I’m espousing in the preview. Which is coming in a couple of hours.
Posted from
United States

-



I think Caceres is worth a shot on the left where he should be the most comfortable since that is where he plays internationally. I remember watching Argentina play Uruguay and Caceres did a half decent job against Messi. I dont think that is what Pep will do though, i think he will do exactly what Hawk is suggesting. That is what he did last time Abidal was out so im not sure why he would do anything different this time. Lets see though….
Im really starting to worry about Lyon. Im not usually the skeptical type but we had to play 60 mins with 10 men and our players looked exhausted. Lyon on the other hand rested all their big players. Away from home with tired legs against a fresh team, add to that the absences of Iniesta and Abidal….it really worries me….
Posted from
United States

-



Hector, I agree about the RB’s (I would take Alves over Maicon, but they’re definitely the top 2).
I disagree about that CL game. I’m talking about the one at old trafford. We attacked through the right a lot, Messi got the ball a lot, and we barely broke into their danger zone once or twice. Messi got shut down almost everytime. I don’t think that’s because Messi totally sucked, it was in large part because Evra and the rest of the ManU defense did a great job.Just saying, he can step up defensively too. Nobody’s talking about replacing Abidal, we were talkaing about adding more depth. Anyway, I don’t think the team is lacking in depth, and even if we wanted Evra ManU can’t afford to lose him so they won’t hand him over. Plus, having two high quality players that can only play in one position and both deserve to start is not sustainable.
You can have Iniesta and Henry, both quality players, because Iniesta can play as a midfielder or a left wing forward, and Henry can also play as a left wing but he actually prefers to play as a center forward. I don’t think it will work out in the long term to have Abidal and Evra.
Posted from
United States

-



I believe the lineup Pep might us is
Alves-Pique-Puyol-Sylvinho
Hleb-Xavi-Keita
Messi-Eto-HenryKeita was red carded so why rest him and Hleb hasn’t played in a while so he is the only fully rested midfielder we have.
Caceres might replace Sylvinho since i doubt he can last a whole 90mins and Bojan & Guddy might make some cameos.
Posted from
United States

-



The problem with playing three natural CB’s on the backline is with counterattacks and playing in space. A CB and a FB have different skillsets. Abidal was the fastest of the three man backline we usually play which gave him a huge advantage in tracking down counterattacks and playing in space (which, along with set pieces, is how most of the goals are scored against us BTW). A FB is faster and nimbler than a CB not only because they have to bomb forward and track back quicker but because they are usually the ones playing in space against shifty wingers and forwards whereas the CB’s do a significant amount of defending in a more compressed space where positioning and strength get a little more priority. We, IMO, need atleast one pacy fast guy in the back to match up against counters and attackers in space. Puyol, Marquez, and Pique are very good CB’s but they don’t come close to Abidal when it comes to pace. Puyol will play his heart out but he still wont be nearly as effective in that position (he usually plays right back when he playes FB) and will probably injure himself again trying too hard. Caceres and VicSan are IMO the only defenders we currently have with the pace to match up to the counters. I vote for Caceres.
Either way, this is Guardiola we’re talking about. How much do you wanna bet he converts Hleb to a left fullback? No? How about Henry? Or Messi?
Posted from
United States

-



Tajh, you’re missing one of Yaya or Busi. Guardiola will definitely play a DM in this match to go up against Jouninho in the middle. Unless you’re saying Keita is the DM.
Posted from
United States

-



Hector, I’m currently writing up the lineup that Guardiola won’t use. Should I try reverse psychology?
Posted from
United States

-



Please Isaiah, by all means.
Its worth a shot. Just write down the WORSE possible line-up. The exact opposite of what we want. If we put 3 on Lyon and keep a clean sheet then you know what to do for the rest of the season. I don’t know what else to do.
BTW Apparently they’ve started to call crazy line-ups or subs “Guardioladas” in Spain/Catalonia. No joke.
Posted from
United States

-



yea Isaiah that is true but i think reports on goal.com says Juninho would make an appearance for the final half hour of the fixture if not Busi might replace Keita.
Posted from
United States

-



Lest it grows too much… Hector, I’ve been hearing the “Guardiolada/Guardiolades” thing for severals months now, and, for the time being, it’s always been in a positive way, with a mix of amusement and admiration (because they’ve worked OK). Surely, it’s been repeated since saturday in connection with his decisions against the pericos, but the catalan media has not attacked him at all. Everybody agrees that Pep’s got a lot of credit and that he’s been the first to bring down the euphoria surrounding the team.
By the way, making the team put crosses from everywhere and putting Busi as center forward in order to catch some header is another “Cruyffism”, the reappearance of which I foretold some weeks ago (don’t remember why now… Must be getting old!). In the dream-team era, when things went bad, this last-resort role was played by Alexanko, a tall center back.
Posted from
Spain

-



Of course, the reason for such “last resort” was the same in the dream-team era as it is now: the absence of a tank-like center forward, the kind of player that Pep asked from day 1.
Posted from
Spain

-



Very interesting stuff Genis. Glad to see you around here. I only heard about the Guardiolada after reading about it at different sources yesterday (me not being in Spain at the time and all). I think its brilliant and certainly understand that its all been in good faith. I’m loving Pep as a coach so far and for one that gambles so much it was only a matter of time before a move didn’t work out. It certainly doesn’t take anything away from what he’s done so far.
I remember having read something somewhere about how the Busquets sub was a “Cruyffism” like you said (I’m honestly too young to remember the Dream Team in detail). That’s very interesting although it also highlights our lack of a Larsson type big tall area striker to use in situations like these. I know Busi was a striker back in the day but we should probably have somebody on the roster for situations like these.
I always enjoy you’re insights from Barcelona.
Posted from
United States

-



Ooops. You pretty much said what I wrote in my second paragraph and posted it while I was writing mine. Guess we’re of the same mind in that regard
.Posted from
United States

-



First off – that was a great write up on the game, Kevin, and I appreciate that you accepted the loss rather than come up with excuses. For my viewing, that was an excellent, excellent(!) derby. It was gritty, sweat and blood, play your hearts out stuff. Espanyol came out with their cleats up and were giving Barcelona the business from the word go. You can hardly blame them, especially when you consider the relative positions on the table, and the fact Barcelona had already spanked them three times this season. They won the match the only way they could: by scraping, diving, wasting time and taking precious care with the chances they were given (hats off to De la Pena, he was tremendous).
As for the edit on Madridista commenters, as a Real fan and a regular contributor to this page, I’d like to point out that there are some of us who’ve been a part of discussions here from the beginning of the season. I haven’t read any of the comments in question, and regret if they were in poor taste. I personally love it when Barce fans contribute over at the Real offside (Hector’s comments have been particularly insightful lately, and much appreciated) but I have to say that all season long we’ve endured a deluge of hecklers boasting blaugrana. Not that that justifies anything, but I can understand why some Real fans might want to finally give some back.
Anyhow, the title race is hotting up nicely, and I think I can speak for fans of both clubs when I say I wouldn’t want it any other way. Hay Liga!
Posted from
United States

-



john, of course you’ve been around for longer than just this season. And have always been welcome. You may be a madridista, but eh, we all have our shortcomings
Also, you’re wrong about Barça handing Espanyol its ass on a platter 3 times. I’m not sure we ever blew them out of the water. The first was a 1-2 win in the last second, the second was a 0-0 draw, and the third was a 3-2 win (though it did start off 3-0). Not really a huge goal difference over the course of the 4 games…+1…
Posted from
United States

-



Has anyone noted yet that Yaya’s goal this last Saturday was the first one scored in the league this season that did not result in at least one point? Cool.
Perhaps there’s some comfort to be taken in the idea…maybe not the fact…that the two losses we’ve conceded this year (I’m not counting Copa Catalunya or that last unnecessary game against…who…Shakhtar?…in CL) were against teams that looked like the bottom teams in the league. Numancia, first game of the season: minnows, and everyone expected them to be pushovers. Espanyol, bottom of the table and vanquished thrice.
Still I hope there’s no attitude shift. Marquez said something in an interview this week like “the pressure’s on them (Madrid, the rest of the league.” I didn’t think of it at the time but…
Posted from
United States

-



All this talk about Ribery and a winger…
A team can’t have two #10s. That’s why Ronaldinho left when Messi came into his own. Our payroll would be outrageous. We should be in the market for solid second-stringers, people who can step in every fourth week and create a REAL rotation system and give the starters a break.
And why haven’t I heard any talk about a backup for Xavi? I think most of us are in agreement that no one looks more tired than he does, and though Iniesta could conceivably slip into that role, he has only done so two or three times because he’s more effective as a more straight-up attacker (remember when I said he was better playing deeper? Neither do I.). I don’t know if Guardiola is quite comfortable putting out a side without Xavi. When he’s not there, he feels he MUST put Iniesta on, so SPF’s injury is not good news at all. It’s a tough player to find a backup for, a maestro, especially if he’s signed as that, a backup. This always brings us back to Fabregas, but I still think Xavi is definitely the preference between the two (but he’s not getting any younger)…
Blah blah…
I’m confident that, though, Xavi and all the other players we’ve been calling tired will play their hearts out in Lyon in a knockout setting, and the fatigue will barely be apparent. This was one hell of a wakeup call, after all. Atletico…let’s hope, because their background with us this season is something like Espanyol’s.
Posted from
United States

-



Alex, i think that we cant buy a Xavi back up because if we ever dont have xavi available, Pep would throw iniesta in xavi’s role, and throw someone else in to cover iniesta’s role. So it would leave very little game time for whoever it is that we buy. Again, i know ive said this too often, and too many ways, but its a problem that Iniesta is not only a first team player, but also out 2nd string “4″, and out Second string LM.
This hypothetical player would be great right now that iniesta is injured, but i cant imagine him being a better Xavi than Iniesta, so essentialy, this player would only play when BOTH Iniesta and Xavi need rest, or in case of an injury. So he’d play alot of copa del rey, less important CL games. and Liga games before and after important CL matches.
Posted from
United States

-



Sadly enough the player that i think would be a GREAT player is one we sold in the summer: Giovanni dos Santos
I know most people wouldnt want him back, but:
1. He is VERY talented. Henry said he had the potential to be the best in the world. At the end of the season he was showing alot of his skill. One can argue that he was trying to alert other clubs of it, but his skill is undeniable.
2. He is Versatile. Like all Barca players, he is naturally a Wide Forward, but is also comfortable playing in Iniesta’s role, the next-to-xavi-bomb-into-the-box-dribbling-attacking-center-mid.
3. Some might say that he didnt impress last season. I will argue that there were about 20 others on the squad that also didnt impress. and for a 19 year old to look good while lacking adequate support would be very improbable.
4. Rijkaard didnt play him enough. Should he have gotten impatient and left? no, but he especially with Ronnie, Messi, and Eto’o out so long, Gio should have gotten more minutes. Under Pep, he could be set sraight.
5. He shouldnt be very expensive. He is unused at Tottenham, and not because he is not good, but because he has no business playing in the prem. Its hard for the quicker smaller players to succeed there.
6. Gio > Hleb & Guddjohanson.i think thats it…
Posted from
United States

-



Weirdly, I agree, Jason. But step #1 is the kid fires his agent. What a nut.
Posted from
United States

Read the rest of the comments
Comments are closed













